board controls - turning off signatures??
Moderator: Moderators
- BIGVDOGG
- Completist
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:33 pm
your insult to me doesnt dignify a response here.check your pmThe Horrible Esthete wrote:Actually, "LargeFiveCanine", it would still be an issue to everyone who gets annoyed at huge images in sigs; I know for a fact that day_for_night and yours truly aren't the only ones.BIGVDOGG wrote:Yeh i would have to disagree on your observation.if someone wasnt worried about someone looking over their shoulder at school this would not be an issue.(well maybe not for some people)
In reality "this would not be an issue" if people didn't put annoyingly large images in their sigs.
- tigerthelion
- Lighthouse Keeper
- Posts: 3777
- Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 2:12 pm
Oh, isn't that cute? A few people private messaged ya and cried about big sic pics. Oh, poor people. I feel so bad for them, and Ryan Smyth.The Horrible Esthete wrote:Actually, "LargeFiveCanine", it would still be an issue to everyone who gets annoyed at huge images in sigs; I know for a fact that day_for_night and yours truly aren't the only ones.BIGVDOGG wrote:Yeh i would have to disagree on your observation.if someone wasnt worried about someone looking over their shoulder at school this would not be an issue.(well maybe not for some people)
In reality "this would not be an issue" if people didn't put annoyingly large images in their sigs.
- The Horrible Esthete
- Wheat King
- Posts: 2571
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 6:03 pm
How did I insult you? By telling you that huge pics in sigs annoy some people who aren't necessarily worried about people looking over our shoulders?BIGVDOGG wrote: your insult to me doesnt dignify a response here.check your pm
That makes me a dick?
- BIGVDOGG
- Completist
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:33 pm
(LargeFiveCanine)-do you think that may have something to do with it?where do you get off calling me anything other than my user name?i didnt insult you.i merely responded to an opinion with an opinion.i dont need a thread beef so if you got an issue p.m.peaceThe Horrible Esthete wrote:How did I insult you? By telling you that huge pics in sigs annoy some people who aren't necessarily worried about people looking over our shoulders?BIGVDOGG wrote: your insult to me doesnt dignify a response here.check your pm
That makes me a dick?
- The Horrible Esthete
- Wheat King
- Posts: 2571
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 6:03 pm
Uh....one person pm'd me to call me a dick for saying that big pics in sigs are annoying...but dude, it's really just an opinion, and since it applies to all who come here, I think we are all entitled to an opinion on the subject.tigerthelion wrote:Oh, isn't that cute? A few people private messaged ya and cried about big sic pics. Oh, poor people. I feel so bad for them, and Ryan Smyth.The Horrible Esthete wrote:Actually, "LargeFiveCanine", it would still be an issue to everyone who gets annoyed at huge images in sigs; I know for a fact that day_for_night and yours truly aren't the only ones.BIGVDOGG wrote:Yeh i would have to disagree on your observation.if someone wasnt worried about someone looking over their shoulder at school this would not be an issue.(well maybe not for some people)
In reality "this would not be an issue" if people didn't put annoyingly large images in their sigs.
And I apologize (to you, at least) for the smart-ass remarks about schoolboy crushes and wet-dream subjects....I was just busting your chops a little bit.....
-
- Experienced Groupie
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 2:47 pm
listen buddy,BIGVDOGG wrote:Yeh i would have to disagree on your observation.if someone wasnt worried about someone looking over their shoulder at school this would not be an issue.(well maybe not for some people)
it was just an example as to why i asked for the change. the main reason is that a message board looks alot cleaner with signatures and avatars disabled. which is what i asked for as a personal preference...the fact that this can't be done, and so pic size had to be limited, is not my fault. take it up with the board admin instead of taking pot shots at people.
and you honestly got offended by getting called 'largefivecanine'?? its a synonym of your user name! come off it...
Last edited by day_for_night on Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:04 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- The Horrible Esthete
- Wheat King
- Posts: 2571
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 6:03 pm
Oh. That.BIGVDOGG wrote: (LargeFiveCanine)-do you think that may have something to do with it?where do you get off calling me anything other than my user name?i didnt insult you.i merely responded to an opinion with an opinion.i dont need a thread beef so if you got an issue p.m.peace
Isn't that the literal translation of your screenname? I really didn't think I was crossing any lines there.
My bad BigDog. Can I call you BigDog? That's not an insult, is it?
- BIGVDOGG
- Completist
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:33 pm
maybe if i had interaction with or we were friends with this person i wouldnt be offended.geezday_for_night wrote:listen buddy,BIGVDOGG wrote:Yeh i would have to disagree on your observation.if someone wasnt worried about someone looking over their shoulder at school this would not be an issue.(well maybe not for some people)
it was just an example as to why i asked for the change. the main reason is that a message board looks alot cleaner with signatures and avatars disabled. which is what i asked for as a personal preference...the fact that this can't be done, and so pic size had to be limited, is not my fault. take it up with the board admin instead of taking pot shots at people.
and you honestly got offended by getting called 'largefivecanine'?? its a synonym of your user name! come off it...